Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 382
B.J.P. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6388
Plaintiff: B.J.P.
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (SCDC), By and Through Its Director, Bryan P. Stirling, SCDC DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, in his Individual and Official Capacities, SCDC DEP. DIR. DENNIS PATTERSON, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Adam Hall v. DAC Prison
as 24-6261
Plaintiff: ADAM WADE HALL, a/k/a Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant: DAC PRISON and RAYMOND BAILEY, Tabor CI Program Director
US v. James Bailey, Jr.
as 24-6191
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES W. BAILEY, JR., a/k/a James W. "Bill" Bailey, Jr.
Marqueion Harrison v. Warden Bullard
as 24-6128
Plaintiff: MARQUEION HARRISON
Defendant: WARDEN BULLARD, STEPHEN JACOBS, SERGEANT LEGGETT and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff: KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant: LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
In re: Christopher Bailey
as 23-308
Petitioner: In re: CHRISTOPHER J. BAILEY
Jacob Rader v. Mack Bailey
as 23-7245
Petitioner / Appellant: JACOB RADER
Respondent / Appellee: MACK BAILEY, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2236
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
US v. Andrew Bailey
as 23-7107
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW DEAN BAILEY
Tamar Harvey v. Ralph Coleman
as 23-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH R. COLEMAN, Lieutenant, TIMOTHY W. GREEN, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 6, M.A. BAILEY, Senior Warden and others
Defendant: SERGEANT HOBBS, SERGEANT WOODBURY, E. CLAY, AD Food Service Manager and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?