Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Mark Bolling
as 23-4572
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BOLLING
Andrew Fields, III v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN STREEVAL, A. W. GOLDEY and others
Randy Richardson v. Prince George's County
as 23-1235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, ANGELA ALSOBROOKS and MELINDA BOLLING
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L. and B.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER and others
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-1966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK O. LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L., B.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant:
STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER, BENNETT W. BRASFIELD and others
Samuel Sloan v. Maria Childress
as 20-1566
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK HERRING, SHAYAM RAMAN, WILLIAM G. PETTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL H. SLOAN
Christopher Bolling v. Harold Clarke
as 18-6164
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN BOLLING
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jonathan Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiner
as 11-2115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN BOLLS
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS
Jonathan Bolls v. W. Street, III
as 10-2361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN BOLLS
Defendant - Appellee:
W. SCOTT STREET, III, Secretary of the Virginia Board of Examiners
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
