Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Andrew Anderson v. State of North Carolina
as 24-1277
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans and ANDREW DOUGLAS ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY A. COOPER, III, an individual, and Governor of North Carolina and others
US v. Derik Bowers
as 24-4061
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DERIK WAYNE BOWERS
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Marilyn Seay Propst v. State of West Virginia
as 23-2112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARILYN E. SEAY PROPST
Plaintiff:
DAWN PROPST, CHARLES PROPST, DAWN LOCKARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, JERRY MOORE, JEFF BOWERS and others
Lamont Holliman v. Col. Bowers
as 23-6985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT ANGELO HOLLIMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. BOWERS, WILLIAM SMITH and LT. HUMPRESS
US v. Norman Bowers
as 23-4489
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NORMAN SENEKA BOWERS
US v. Norman Bowers
as 23-4488
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NORMAN SENEKA BOWERS
Warren Giddings v. Correctional Officer Charriez
as 23-6121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHARRIEZ, MCTC, Hagerstown, MD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GRUBBS, MCTC, Hagerstown, MD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARGER, MCTC, Hagerstown, MD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
