Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C. C. BLAKE and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. K. Mackey
as 17-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 17-7282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, ZONING AND INSPECTIONS and M. WILSON
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Glenn Henderson v. Jim Ammon
as 15-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM AMMONS, in his official and personal capacity, MARY ANN TALLY, in her official and personal capacity, NATHAN HATCH and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
