Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
SC State Conference of the NAACP v. Alan Wilson
as 23-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, MARVIN NEAL, ROBYNNE CAMPBELL and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Tamer Mahmoud v. Monifa McKnight We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1890
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAMER MAHMOUD, ENAS BARAKAT, JEFF ROMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: MONIFA B. MCKNIGHT, SHEBRA L. EVANS, LYNNE HARRIS and others
Amicus Curiae: DOUGLAS LAYCOCK, Professor, HELEN M. ALVARE, Professor, THOMAS C. BERG, Professor and others
David Meyers v. US
as 23-6729
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FNU LNU, United States Department of Justice Director, FNU LNU, Director of the Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts and others
Kimberly Brown v. Holiday Inn Express & Suites We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1520
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIMBERLY J. BROWN, JD
Defendant / Appellee: HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS & SUITES, INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL GROUP AMERICAS OFFICE, BON SECOURS RETREAT CONFERENCE CENTER and others
Ronald Emrit v. British Secret Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1174
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: BRITISH SECRET SERVICE, CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF ENGLAND, HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE LITIGATION and others
Ronald Emrit v. British Secret Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1172
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: BRITISH SECRET SERVICE, CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF ENGLAND, HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE LITIGATION and others
Caryn Strickland v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1963
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARYN DEVINS STRICKLAND
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, BRIAN STACY MILLER, The Hon., in his official capacity as Chair of the Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial Resources and others
Bishop of Charleston v. Marcia Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1175
Plaintiff / Appellant: BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Intervenor Defendant: ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Bishop of Charleston v. Orangeburg County
as 21-1912
Plaintiff / Appellee: BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Jane Roe v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1346
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, JAMES N. ISHIDA, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as Circuit Executive of the Fourth Circuit and as Secretary of the Judicial Council of the Fourth Circuit, SHERYL L. WALTER, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE ROE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?