Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6009
Defendant / Appellee:
STETVEN A. JONES, Captain, SERGEANT T. H. WILLIAMSON, JANE DOE, Medical Contractor Mediko employee and others
Defendant:
MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region, COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER
Ronald Tharrington, Jr. v. Dale Moreno
as 19-7039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD A. THARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
L. JONES, L.P.N., H. C. RAY, Regional Administrator of Health Services, DAVIS, Former Assistant Warden of Buckingham Correctional Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. DALE MORENO
McKindley Travis v. Patricia Watson
as 16-7400
Petitioner - Appellant:
MCKINDLEY TRAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA WATSON
Respondent:
NELSON H. C. FISHER
John Stritzinger v. John Stratton
as 16-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN S. STRITZINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN STRATTON, Verizon Business, CHRISTIANA CARE, JAMES CLAPPER, NSC and others
Bernard Richardson v. Dulane
as 16-6906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR DULANES, N. STANFORD, Head Nurse W.R.S.P., LESLIE FLEMING, Warden W.R.S.P. and others
McKindley Travis v. Sharratt
as 11-6684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCKINDLEY TRAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
W. ALLAN SHARRATT, Judge, PATRICIA WATSON, Commonwealth Attorney, NELSON H. C. FISHER, Commonwealth Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
