Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Laquita Oliver v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-188
Petitioner:
LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Respondent:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Gerald Hopper v. Garry McFadden
as 24-6050
Plaintiff:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant:
GARRY L. MCFADDEN, Sheriff, Mecklenburg County, In his official capacity, MARY LEBLISS, Medical Doctor, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity, DESTINY WALTERS, Physician Assistant, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Gerald Hopper
as 23-6684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Jay-Bee Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Brenda Hopper
as 23-161
Petitioner:
JAY-BEE OIL & GAS, INC., a West Virginia corporation, JAY-BEE PRODUCTION COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, JB EXPLORATION I, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company and others
Respondent:
BRENDA LEA HOPPER, Co-Executrix of Allen E. Smith's Estate, DEBRA LYNN KURFIS, Co-Executrix of Allen E. Smith's Estate and JUDITH E. ASH-YOUNG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Gerald Hopper v. William Salazar
as 23-1050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SALAZAR
Gerald Hopper v. William Salazar
as 22-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SALAZAR, CMPD Police Officer
Defendant:
TIM SIELAFF, Assistant District Attorney, MELODIE PELLOT-HERNANDEZ, Assistant District Attorney and FNU HUNTER, Assistant District Attorney, in official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
