Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Michael Scott v. Baltimore County, Maryland
as 23-1731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SCOTT, RUDOLPH ARMSTRONG, AARON KESSLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
Dale Field, Jr. v. Judy Fitzgerald
as 17-1031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE P. FIELD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDY FITZGERALD, in her official capacity as Adult Parole Authority, GARY MOHR, in his official capacity as Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and CYNTHIA MAUSSER, in her official capacity as Chief, Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Angela Swagler v. Neighoff
as 11-1784
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANGELA SWAGLER, ELIZABETH WALSH, JACK AMES and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN WALSH
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES NEIGHOFF, State Trooper, in his offical and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER BRADLEY, State Trooper, in his official and in his individual capacity, WALTER RASINSKI, State Trooper, in his official and in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HARFORD MARYLAND, TOWN OF BEL AIR, Maryland, TERRENCE SHERIDAN, Colonel, in his offical capacity as Superintendent of the Maryland State Police and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jack Ames v. Donald Ravadge
as 10-1595
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACK AMES, LAURA BEESON, NATHAN G. CAIN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD RAVADGE, Town of Bel Air Police Officer, both individually and in their official capacities, MARK ZULAUF and ARMAND DUPRE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HARFORD MARYLAND, TOWN OF BEL AIR, Maryland, TERRENCE SHERIDAN, Colonel, in his offical capacity as Superintendent of the Maryland State Police and others
US v. Mohr
as 07-7526
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHANIE MOHR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
