Cases 1 - 10 of 469
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner:
DAVON TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Bruno Mpoy v. State of Maryland
as 24-1474
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY, Individually and as a Next Friend of T.M. and C.M.
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, MARCY WAXMAN and others
Robert Moore v. State of Maryland
as 24-6325
Petitioner:
ROBERT GARY MOORE
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND and WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER
Na'Im Anderson v. Baltimore County, Maryland
as 24-1314
Plaintiff:
NA'IM ANDERSON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND, OFFICE OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY and others
State of Maryland v. 3M Company
as 24-1218
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CORTEVA INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. and others
Kendall Smith v. U.S. Judge Paula Xinis
as 24-1365
Plaintiff:
KENDALL R. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. JUDGE PAULA XINIS, STATE OF MARYLAND and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Grant Anderson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
as 24-1339
Plaintiff:
GRANT ANDERSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE
Steven Boas v. Jason Graves
as 24-1343
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MATTHEW BOAS
Defendant:
JASON GRAVES, in his individual capacity as deputy sheriff, St. Mary's County, TIMOTHY K. CAMERON, in his official capacity as the Executive, St. Mary's County Sheriff Office, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Ray Blanchard v. Brian Frosh
as 24-6372
Petitioner:
RAY A. BLANCHARD
Respondent:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General for the State of Maryland and WARDEN GREGORY WERNER
Steven Albert v. Brooke Lierman
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
STEVEN G. ALBERT and BARRY DIAMOND
Defendant:
BROOKE E. LIERMAN, in her official capacity as the Comptroller of the State of Maryland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
