Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
LIBRE IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Judson Witham v. US
as 21-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDSON WITHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, INTERNATIONAL PAPER AND POWER INC. and others
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office, ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Davetta Range v. Dana Van Metre
as 20-1345
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BRIAN A. JACKSON, SA RACHEL ROLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.
as 14-1945
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maryland, WILLIAM M, PALLOZZI, Colonel (pty), Colonel, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of State Police and Superintendent of the Maryland State Police, DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WINK'S SPORTING GOODS, INCORPORATED, ASSOCIATED GUN CLUBS OF BALTIMORE, INCORPORATED, ATLANTIC GUNS, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW W. TURNER, SHAWN J. TARDY and MATTHEW GODWIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
