Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. United States Embassy of Poland
as 24-1603
Defendant:
STATE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (USCIS), EMBASSY OF POLAND, in the United States and others
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d/b/a United Emrits of America and PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hans Lasway v. Kathy Baran
as 23-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANS IKAMBA LASWAY and IKUMBO CHARLOTTE NYANGE
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHY A. BARAN, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, California Service Center Director, UR M. JADDOU, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service Director, Office of the General Counsel, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, United States Secretary Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2175
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Min Kim v. USCIS
as 22-1413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIN JEONG KIM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
