Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Robert Moore v. State of Maryland
as 24-6325
Petitioner:
ROBERT GARY MOORE
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND and WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
Robert Moore v. Warden of W.C.I.
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF W.C.I. SHANE WEBER, NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I., DOCTOR OF W.C.I. JOHN DOE and others
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
US v. Dallas Weber, Jr.
as 23-6495
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DALLAS EDWARD WEBER, JR.
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6148
Petitioner:
RONALD COX
Respondent:
WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTHONY G. BROWN
Miguel Angel Rivera v. Wayne Hill
as 23-6065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL A. RIVERA-ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR WAYNE O. HILL, WARDEN AT J.C.I. ALLEN GANG, SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEE and others
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6044
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD COX
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEN GANG, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and others
Matthew Orso v. Douglas-Ray Sullivan
as 22-2177
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW E. ORSO, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com, in his capacity as Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD DISNER, TRUDY GILMOND, TRUDY GILMOND, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DARLENE ARMEL, RONALD COX, FRANK SCHEUNEMAN and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS-RAY SULLIVAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
