Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 96
US v. Lawrence Wilder, Sr.
as 24-6554
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General
as 24-1514
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
US v. Lawrence Wilder, Sr.
as 24-6533
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
US v. Malik Wilder
as 24-4219
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MALIK EARL WILDER
Sandra Wilder-Rhodan v. Nancy McLin
as 24-1249
Plaintiff: SANDRA WILDER-RHODAN, Beneficiary of Estate of George M. Rhodan
Defendant: JUDGE NANCY CHAPMAN MCLIN, State of South Carolina, Family Court, J. GRAHAM STURGIS, JR., Attorney, VERONICA SMALLS, Attorney and others
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. D. Price
as 23-6849
Petitioner: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Respondent: D. H. PRICE, New Hanover County North Carolina Jail Administrator
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Warden
as 23-6725
Petitioner / Appellant: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Joshua Stein
as 23-6699
Petitioner / Appellant: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: JOSHUA STEIN and D. H. PRICE
The Wilderness Society v. Bureau of Land Management
as 23-1594
Petitioner: THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
Respondent: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and MITCHELL LEVERETTE, in his official capacity as State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Eastern States
Intervenor: MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?