Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
Shawn Wiley v. Warden Scarantino
as 22-6572
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN ANTONIO WILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SCARANTINO
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
US v. Maurice Wiley, Jr.
as 21-4458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE OWEN WILEY, JR., a/k/a Tweet
US v. Marcus Wiley
as 21-6889
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS ANTWAN WILEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Kenneth Wiley
as 21-4184
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH JEROME WILEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Shawn Wiley v. FMC Butner
as 19-6716
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN ANTONIO WILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FMC BUTNER
Karreem Tislam Jabar Wiley v. Warden Larry Cartledge
as 17-7239
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARREEM TISLAM JABAR WILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
