Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03320
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Corbin v. Leu et al
as 5:2022hc02033
Petitioner:
Thomas Jay Corbin
Respondent:
Warden D. Leu, United States of America and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Avery v. Leu et al
as 5:2022hc02032
Petitioner:
Dylan Avery
Respondent:
Warden D. Leu, United States of America and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States et al
as 5:2021ct03158
Defendant:
Lawrence Sichel, United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanking v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03149
Defendant:
BOP Officer 2, BOP Officer 1 and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Lanking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03108
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Ramos et al
as 5:2021hc02027
Respondent:
Director of BOP and Warden Ramos
Petitioner:
Andrique Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boles v. Ramos et al
as 5:2020hc02236
Respondent:
Warden Ramos and Director of BOP
Petitioner:
Brian Lee Boles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
