Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 79
HARDIN v. POOLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00674
Defendant: OFFICER WHITE, OFFICER WILEY, CAPTAIN COVINGTON and others
Plaintiff: CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2019cv00577
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant: ADAMS, LT. G. A. DORN, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
ADAMS v. USA
as 1:2019cv00552
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: TIMOTHY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DUNCAN v. SCHATZMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00353
Defendant: K. ADAMS, SABEL CALDWELL, WENDY HOGAN and others
Plaintiff: JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. SETTLE et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant: NURSE WILLIAMS, K. ADAMS, B. F. KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. WHITT et al
as 1:2019cv00285
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant: K. ADAMS, GUARD OWENS, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00287
Defendant: K. ADAMS, UNKNOWN NAMED WHITE MALE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST, MILES KIVETT and others
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant: FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. USA
as 1:2019cv00243
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: FLOYD ANTHONY ADAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TUCKER v. CRAVEN et al
as 1:2019cv00246
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant: ADAMS, KEEFE, SGT. GUARD WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?