Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 79
PINKARD v. SLATE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00213
Plaintiff: TONY LAMAR PINKARD, SR.
Defendant: SLATE and K. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLDMAN v. SAUNDERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00430
Petitioner: LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Respondent: SORRELL SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDMAN v. MAHER, et al
as 1:2013cv00389
Plaintiff: LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant: THOMAS K. MAHER, DANIELLE M. CARMAN, HEATHER L. RATTELADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDMAN v. SAUNDERS et al
as 1:2013cv00215
Plaintiff: LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant: SORRELL SAUNDERS, TORRES, LOWERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOINER v. COX et al
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff: RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant: CHUCK COX, K. ADAMS, KINDRED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00685
Petitioner: TIMOTHY ADAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ADAMS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00574
Petitioner: TIMOTHY ADAMS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
POSEY V. TALBERT ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00151
Plaintiff: JEROME POSEY
Defendant: WAYNE TALBERT, LIEUTENANT DIXON, SGT. PASQAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00893
Petitioner: TIMOTHY ADAMS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GOLDMAN v. KELLER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00258
Petitioner: LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Respondent: ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?