Cases 1 - 10 of 50
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent:
ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KING v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
MR. DICKERSON and MR. PHILLIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
LAMANUEL LAMAR KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WIGGINS v. TRAGESER et al
as 1:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
ALLEN KING WIGGINS
Defendant:
MARCELLA (MARCY) TRAGESER, JAMIE KIRKMAN and JESSICA NORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
ALLEN KING WIGGINS
Defendant:
CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTPHIN v. CITY OF KING N.C.
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN SUTPHIN
Defendant:
CITY OF KING N.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
