Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Kuluva et al v. Taylor
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
William Kuluva, Kastle Ventures, LLC and Sterling Gaming International, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Strong v. Shelter Plus Care et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Strong
Defendant:
Shelter Plus Care, Mecklenburg County, Kenya Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Parshall v. Park Sterling Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Park Sterling Corporation, Leslie M. Baker, Jr., Walter C. Ayers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Roskopf v. Park Sterling Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
Michael Roskopf
Defendant:
Park Sterling Corporation, James Cherry, Leslie M. Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Krebs et al v. Charlotte School of Law, LLC, et al
as 3:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Spencer Krebs , Morgan Switzer , Dave Wyatt and others
Defendant:
Charlotte School of Law, LLC , InfiLaw Corporation , Jay Conison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Levy et al v. Charlotte School of Law, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Raissa Levy , James Villanueva , Shanna Rivera and others
Defendant:
Charlotte School of Law, LLC , InfiLaw Holding, LLC , InfiLaw, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bess v. Perry et al
as 5:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sterling Bess
Defendant:
FNU Perry, Susan White and Eric Dye
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Sterling Trust, LTD
as 3:2016mc00135
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Sterling Trust, Ltd
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Roseboro v. USA
as 3:2016cv00475
Petitioner:
Sterling Rafael Roseboro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
