Cases 41 - 50 of 1,266
Davis v. Mick
as 1:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
David A. Mick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Davis v. Dental Department II Building
as 1:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Dental Department II Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Davis v. Pandya
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Asha S. Pandya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Tra-Mel D. Lee
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis v. Norfolk Police Department
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Norfolk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Cheatam
as 2:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Kevin Lee Gregory
Respondent:
Mr. Carlton, District Attorney of Stafford County and Roy Cheatam, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Carrow
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
William O. Carrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Lee v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
David J. Lee
Defendant:
Deputy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Myungjin Jung
Defendant:
Sang Keon Lee, Chan Hee Edward Lee and Vincent Jiwoo Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
