Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miles v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jackee L. Miles
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burt v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Paul Leigh Burt
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Dr. William Miles and Dr. Hench Croff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yu v. Blankenship et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Henry Yu
Defendant:
Ms. Blankenship, Ms. Blane and Dr. Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose v. Foundation Building Materials, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ambrose
Defendant:
Foundation Building Materials, LLC, FBM Southeast, LLC, DeAndre McKnight-Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Naugle v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Robert Miles Naugle
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority and Larry Lebough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geoff McDonald & Associates, P.C. v. Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.
as 3:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Geoff McDonald & Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Powell v. Tempple et al
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
TaSean Powell
Defendant:
Brandon Tempple, Portray Temple, Dillon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Harvin et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Ronald Miles
Defendant:
Ms. Harvin, Mr. Murphy and Mr. Rambler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Clarke
as 1:2021cv01120
Petitioner:
Ronald Miles
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
