Cases 31 - 40 of 14,159
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. City of Wheeling, West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Defendant:
City of Wheeling, West Virginia and The City of Wheeling Planning Commission
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Lee Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Aflibercept Patent Litigation
as 1:2024md03103
Not Yet Classified:
AFLIBERCEPT PATENT LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AMGEN USA, INC., BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Gregg v. Autozone Parts, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Aja Gregg
Defendant:
Autozone Parts, Inc. and Adam Lee Sealey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McClure v. Saint Marys Correctional Center Jail
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Christie Coy McClure, Jr.
Defendant:
Saint Marys Correctional Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Cesar M. Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Defendant:
Dr. Ayne Amjad, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Damion Dante Maurice Green
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Brandi Otey, Raliegh County Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
