Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 308
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee: KERRY CONSTATINE, BEATRICE BELL, CARINNE D. KARLICK and others
Appellant: DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Defendant / Appellee: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
In re: SCANA Corporation
as 20-1954
Not Classified By Court: In re: SCANA CORPORATION PUBLIC SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
Appellant: SCANA CORPORATION
Defendant: SHARON A. DECKER, LYNNE M. MILLER, GREGORY E. ALIFF and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: METZLER ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
In re: Willis Towers Watson
as 20-442
Not Classified By Court: In re: WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC PROXY LITIGATION
Respondent: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Petitioner: TOWERS WATSON & CO., DOMINIC CASSERLEY, JOHN J. HALEY and others
J.R. v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1767
Plaintiff / Appellant: B.Y., individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, J.R., individually and on behalf of her minor minor children A.R. and H.K., J.S., individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC. and WALGREEN CO.
Merck & Co., Inc. v. FWK Holdings, LLC
as 20-432
Respondent: THE RETIRED FIREFIGHTERS' SECURITY BENEFIT FUND OF THE UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 49 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, WALGREEN CO. and others
Petitioner: SCHERING CORPORATION, SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: ZETIA (EZETIMIBE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Mauricio Coreas v. Jack Kavanaugh
as 20-6984
Petitioner: MAURICIO COREAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, WILLIAM KEMCHA and ` ANGEL GUZMAN CEDILLO
Respondent: WARDEN DONNA BOUNDS, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Angel Cedillo v. Donna Bounds
as 20-7005
Petitioner: MAURICIO COREAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ` ANGEL GUZMAN CEDILLO and WILLIAM KEMCHA
Respondent: JACK KAVANAUGH, WARDEN DONNA BOUNDS, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Bruce E. Katz M.D. P.C. v. Cordell Medical Remarketing Corporation
as 3:2020cv00550
Defendant: Cordell Medical Remarketing Corporation
Plaintiff: Bruce E. Katz M.D. P.C. doing business as Juva Skin and Laser Center and Bruce E. Katz M.D. P.C. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Juva Skin and Laser Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Lexington County, SC
as 20-6939
Defendant / Appellee: ALBERT JOHN DOOLEY, III, in his official capacity as the Associate Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes of the Summary Courts in Lexington County, ROBERT MADSEN, in his official capacity as the Circuit Public Defender for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of South Carolina, BRYAN KOON, in his official capacity as the Lexington County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMY MARIE PALACIOS, RAYMOND WRIGHT, JR., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, SASHA MONIQUE DARBY and others
Petitioner / Appellant: MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
KBC Asset Management NV v. DXC Technology Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1718
Defendant / Appellee: J. MICHAEL LAWRIE, PAUL N. SALEH and DXC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant: KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT NV, ARBEJDSMARKEDETS TILLGSPENSION and ARBEJDSMARKEDETS TILLAEGSPENSION
Plaintiff: CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?