Cases 1 - 10 of 10,664
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGilton v. Straughn
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brent L.V. McGilton
Defendant:
Shawn Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulk v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Mickey Paulk
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Keith Deshon Adams
Defendant:
Oak Hill Police Offi Brandon Dodrill and Oak Hill Police Offi Tyler Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Joseph I. Patterson, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Heather Ray and FBOP Director Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nicholas v. Fairmont State Police et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Nicholas
Defendant:
Fairmont State Police and Steven Fitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grammer v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00312
Petitioner:
Susan Diane Grammer
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Micheal Hedrick
Respondent:
Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Defendant:
Ron White and Josha Dowing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
