Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Biddle et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Debra Biddle and Dennis Biddle
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association , Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Poore Substitute Trustee, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. Zarrabi et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Hossein K. Zarrabi and Mansour K. Yazdani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
U.S. Bank National Association, as successor in interest to Bank of America, National Association v. Yang et al
as 3:2012cv00588
Defendant:
Mary Soon Yang and Estate of Key Chang Yang
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, as successor in interest to Bank of America, National Association,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buonassissi et al v. Yacko et al
as 8:2010cv01272
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Buonassissi, II , Richard E. Henning , Richard A. Lash and others
Defendant:
Ishmael D. Camp and Antonia S. Camp
Counter_claimant:
Ishmael D. Camp
Counter_defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Buonassissi, Henning & Lash, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hebb et al v. Premier Financial Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02334
Plaintiff:
Charles Hebb and Charlene Hebb
Defendant:
Premier Financial Corporation, Premier Financial Corporation, FirstPlus Home Loan Trust 1996-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
HALL et al v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE HALL and ROBERT JOLLY
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, OPTION ONE and HUTCHENS, SENTER & BRITTON, PA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.