Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kenneth E. Neil Revocable Trust v. Laurel Town Center Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Neil Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Laurel Town Center Associates, LLC, Carrollton Enterprises Management Services, LLC, Albert W. Turner Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bancredito Holding Corporation v. Driven Administrative Services LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
BANCRDITO HOLDING CORPORATION and Bancredito Holding Corporation
Defendant:
DRIVEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES LLC, BANCRDITO INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST CORPORATION and Bancredito International Bank and Trust Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
NTE Energy Services Company, LLC v. CEI Kings Mountain Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Castillo Investment Holdings, LLC, CEI Kings Mountain Holdings, LLC and Wattage Finance-NC, LLC
Plaintiff:
NTE Energy Services Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Teamsters Local 677 Health Services and Insurance Plan v. Friedman et al
as 1:2018cv03868
Defendant:
Christopher S. Ripley, J. Duncan Smith, Frederick G. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 677 Health Services and Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Utilipath, LLC v. Hayes et al
as 5:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Utilipath, LLC
Defendant:
Baxter Hayes and Consultant and Management Services of Florida
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75 (2) Contract - Reduction in Grade
Soltesz et al v. Ballard-Hirsch
as 8:2012cv02422
Plaintiff:
James A. Soltesz and Government Services Integrated Process Team, LLC
Defendant:
Susan E. Ballard-Hirsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dixon v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01990
Plaintiff:
Bill Dixon
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation and Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
