Cases 1 - 10 of 1,601
HUTTON v. US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al
as 5:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnett et al v. Rasmussen
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Burnett and Tyler Lalicker
Defendant:
Teagan Rasmussen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Farley v. Lendmark Financial Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Alecia Farley and Farley Aleciay
Defendant:
Lendmark Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Jacob Hiles v. CNN
as 24-1499
Plaintiff:
JACOB GAVIN HILES
Defendant:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INCORPORATED
Massenburg et al v. Tindle
as 8:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Tony Massenburg and Lanie Nikes
Defendant:
Doranna Tindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Harrison v. Jefferson
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Tyra Harrison
Defendant:
Solomon Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Donnellan v. McClure
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Donnellan
Defendant:
Jason Daniel McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Harrison v. RVA Dirt, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Tyra Harrison
Defendant:
RVA Dirt, LLC and Becca Duvall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Mithun Banerjee v. Timothy Rueger
as 24-1463
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE and MALANCHA BANERJEE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. RUEGER, Montgomery County Police Officer and RICHARD M. LUTHER, Montgomery County Police Officer
Bodden v. Town of Bel Air et al
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Levi M Bodden
Defendant:
Town of Bel Air, Bel Air Police Department, Officer Logan F. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
