Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hilton v. Gossard et al
as 5:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
Shana Hilton
Defendant:
Court Gossard and Corp Pres. Bishop Church of Jesus Christ of LDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Irving Twitty v. Nationwide Insurance Company
as 11-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVING E. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, PATRICIA DUGAN, CPCU AiC, CHERYLON DEAN, Claims Invest and others
Tyler v. Tartic et al
as 3:2011cv00046
Interested Party:
Circuit Court of Louisa County
Defendant:
Dobrivoje Tartic and Truscott, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Michael Darocha v. City of Salem General District
as 10-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. DAROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SALEM GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division
Michael Darocha v. Roanoke County General Distric
as 10-1703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. DAROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROANOKE COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division
Darocha v. City of Salem General District Court
as 7:2010cv00218
Defendant:
City of Salem General District Court
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Darocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Darocha v. Roanoke County General District Court
as 7:2010cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Darocha
Defendant:
Roanoke County General District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Irving Twitty v. Nationwide Insurance Company
as 09-2411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVING E. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, PATRICIA DUGAN, CPCU AiC, CHERYLON DEAN, Claims Invest and others
Bennett v. United States District Court Clerk
as 8:2009cv02264
Plaintiff:
Denell Louise Bennett
Defendant:
United States District Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
