Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sandra Kaufman v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04352
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kaufman v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02302
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Hartford Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crane v. Kaufman Trailers of N.C., Inc.
as 3:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ty Crane
Defendant:
Kaufman Trailers of N.C., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kaufman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10946
Plaintiff:
Patricia Kaufman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaufman v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv11734
Plaintiff:
Jeanacarol Kaufman
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaufman v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2015cv10886
Plaintiff:
Arlene Kaufman
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast Corp., Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaufman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02663
Plaintiff:
Myra Kaufman and John Kaufman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Kaufman v. Techtronic Industries North
as 14-2190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES KAUFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED and RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED
Kaufman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08470
Plaintiff:
Pamela E. Kaufman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaufman v. Techtronic Industries North America Inc et al
as 8:2013cv02345
Plaintiff:
Charles Kaufman
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries North America Inc , One World Technologies Inc and Ryobi Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
