Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 131 - 140 of 4,986
Yates v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00752
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Elliott Turbo Machinery Company, FMC Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Graham Yates, Becky Yates and Rebecca Fuquay Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cozart v. Daniel International Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00185
Defendant: Daniel International Corporation, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Fluor Daniel Services Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Martha Estelle Cozart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Moses et al v. Airwell Fedders North America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00194
Defendant: Georgia-Pacific LLC, Trane U.S. Inc., Airwell Fedders North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Billy Junior Moses and Linda Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ray Parker v. Hunting Point Apartments, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2445
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAY ELBERT PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: HUNTING POINT APARTMENTS, LLC, a/k/a Bridgeyard Apartments, a Delaware Corporation affiliate of The Laramar Group, doing business in Virginia as a foreign LLC, HUNTING POINT APARTMENTS, LLC (ILLINOIS BASED), a Delaware Corporation affiliate of the Chicago, Illinois bases, The Laramar Group, JEFF ELOWE, President/CEO, individually and on behalf of the Laramar Group officials as follows, Keith Harris, Marc Jason, Tome Klaess, Steve Boyack, Bennett Neuman, Sr., Ben Slad, Scott McMillan and others
Defendant: IRA LUBERT and DEAN ADLER
Wylds v. A W Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2015cv04627
Plaintiff: Nova C Wylds
Defendant: A W Chesterton Company, Bayer Cropscience Inc, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HESS v. CBS CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2015cv00936
Plaintiff: JAMES MICHAEL HESS
Defendant: CBS CORPORATION , DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, FISHER-KLOSTERMAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray Parker v. Hunting Point Apartments, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2362
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAY ELBERT PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: HUNTING POINT APARTMENTS, LLC, a/k/a Bridgeyard Apartments, a Delaware Corporation affiliate of The Laramar Group, doing business in Virginia as a foreign LLC, HUNTING POINT APARTMENTS, LLC (ILLINOIS BASED), a Delaware Corporation affiliate of the Chicago, Illinois bases, The Laramar Group, JEFF ELOWE, President/CEO, individually and on behalf of the Laramar Group officials as follows, Keith Harris, Marc Jason, Tome Klaess, Steve Boyack, Bennett Neuman, Sr., Ben Slad, Scott McMillan and others
Defendant: IRA LUBERT and DEAN ADLER
Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2248
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOYCE BARLOW
Defendant - Appellant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Clara Mosko v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2252
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARA G. MOSKO
Defendant - Appellant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Young et al v. AGCO Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00054
Defendant: FMC Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff: Carolyn M. Young and Sara Workman
Cross Defendant: Crane Environmental, Inc., William Powell Company and Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?