Cases 101 - 110 of 4,618
Armstrong v. Sumner
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. Maiden Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Keith Baldwin, Jr.
Defendant:
Maiden Police Department and Jamey Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Hayes
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Martin
Defendant:
Dexter Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. State of North Carolina Pitt County et al
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
State of North Carolina Pitt County, Verna Donnelly, Sharon Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEE COUNTY v. HAUBER
as 1:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
LEE COUNTY
Defendant:
CHAD HAUBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Armstrong v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Roy Cooper and Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY et al.
as 1:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
TAL JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
PFEIFFER UNIVERISTY, SUSAN BLAIR, ELIZABETH FAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Wake County, North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis
Defendant:
Wake County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Thornton, et al
as 7:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Trey Jones and Antonio Trey Jones
Defendant:
Mr. James Haywood Thornton, Mr. William T Brady, Andrew Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Swinton v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Shanta Swinton
Defendant:
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Carlton Hadden, Natalie Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
