Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pittman v. Wake Technical Community College et al
as 5:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Eddie LaReece Pittman
Defendant:
Wake Technical Community College, Jason Whitehead, Andrew Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanders v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
Launeil Sanders
Defendant:
Lloyd Ashley Smith, Pat McCrory, Roy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. DELIA
as 1:2012cv01058
Plaintiff:
DELBERT BARRY LLOYD
Defendant:
ALBERT DELIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lewis v. O'Geary, et al
as 5:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
JAMES P. O'GEARY , SAM CURRIN, County of Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. O'GEARY et al
as 1:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
JAMES P. O'GEARY, SEAN CURRIN, COUNTY OF VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2011cv00870
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Gaston County et al
as 3:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Launeil Sanders
Defendant:
Gaston County, Lloyd Ashley Smith, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ENGLISH v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2009cv00866
All Plantiff:
SANDRA J. ENGLISH
Defendant:
JAMES MURPHY, SHEPARD JONES, UKNOWN NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC et al
as 4:2008cv00053
Plaintiff:
George E. Burdick
Defendant:
Pritchett & Birch, PLLC, Lloyd C. Smith, Jr., Regina Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moss et al v. Mackey et al
as 1:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
James David Moss, James Lloyd Moss and Martha Gean Moss
Defendant:
Jeffrey N. Mackey, Scott Sutton, Town of Maggie Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
