Voting Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff: DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant: ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, III, KEVIN LEWIS and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, VIRGINIA A. WASSERBERG and others
Petitioner: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00457
Plaintiff: DONNA PERMAR, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, ROBERT K PRIDDY II and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DAVID C BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Brewster et al v. Berger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00037
Defendant: Phillip E. Berger, David C. Black, Timothy K. Moore and others
Plaintiff: Larry E. Norman, Billy Joe Brewster, Jr., Thomas L. Hill and others
Intervenor Defendant: Richard R. Crews, Gettys Cohen Jr., Donald Rumph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. COOPER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff: WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Defendant: KEN RAYMOND, STELLA ANDERSON, JAY HEMPHILL and others
Intervenor Defendant: Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?