Cases 61 - 70 of 6,820
Young v. Wright
as 9:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
McClain v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv01322
Petitioner:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Bodiford
as 5:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Eliseo Santos
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTO CARRERO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
WALBERTO SANCHEZ PORTO CARRERO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wills v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Theodore Wills
Respondent:
Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middleton v. Columbia Regional Care Center
as 5:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Dedric Middleton
Respondent:
Columbia Regional Care Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroman v. Calhoun County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00698
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Stroman
Respondent:
Calhoun County Sheriffs Department and St. Matthews Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Hunter v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Troy Darnell Hunter
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Joseph
as 9:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Alonzo Tarell Jones
Respondent:
Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
