Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hosley v. Jansen
as 1:2024cv01621
Petitioner:
Otis Hosley
Respondent:
Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Madison v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Otis T. Madison
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00397
Petitioner:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madison v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Otis T. Madison
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2022cv01927
Petitioner:
Otis Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witcher v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Otis W. Witcher
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wimbush v. Riverside Regional Jail
as 3:2021cv00455
Petitioner:
Otis Wimbush
Respondent:
Unknown and Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopkins v. Warden et al
as 8:2020cv02378
Respondent:
Warden and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Otis Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Ormond
as 1:2018cv00770
Petitioner:
Otis Alexander, III
Respondent:
J. Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
