Cases 1 - 10 of 1,098
Brooks v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02112
Petitioner:
Stephen Brooks
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prince v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02111
Petitioner:
Reginald L. Prince
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James-El v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Harry Sharod James-El
Respondent:
The State of North Carolina, County of Mecklenburg, City of Charlotte, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02109
Petitioner:
Terek Harper
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner:
Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerome Butts v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6399
Petitioner:
JEROME JILAH BUTTS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6378
Petitioner:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
