Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Justin Wolfe v. Harold Clarke
as 11-6
Petitioner - Appellee:
JUSTIN MICHAEL WOLFE
Respondent - Appellant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Thomas Ivey v. Jon Ozmint
as 09-3
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS TRESHAWN IVEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, individually and as Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, individually and as Attorney General of South Carolina
Justin Wolfe v. Gene Johnson
as 08-8
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL WOLFE
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
James Reed v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-7
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAMES EARL REED
Respondent - Appellant:
JON OZMINT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina
Elmore v. Ozmint
as 07-14
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD LEE ELMORE
Respondent - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections and HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General, State of South Carolina
Yarbrough v. Johnson
as 07-10
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT STACY YARBROUGH
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Green v. Johnson
as 07-9
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES and THE ARC OF VIRGINIA
Cagle v. Branker
as 07-6
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE CAGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN L. POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections and GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Jackson v. Johnson
as 07-3
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENT JERMAINE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
