Cases 91 - 100 of 116
Marshall v. Emery et al
as 3:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Marshall
Defendant:
Wayne L. Emery, Harry T. Taliaferro and Jessica Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris Pettigrew, Sr. v. Corizon Medical Service
as 12-8077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS J. PETTIGREW, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, PAUL MATERA, MD, DAVID M. MATHIS, MD and others
Party Below:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pettigrew v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2012cv01713
Plaintiff:
Morris J. Pettigrew, Sr.
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Dr. Clem, Paul Matera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2012cv00932
Plaintiff:
James A. Stanley
Defendant:
Kathleen Green, Jason Clem, Jessica Cecil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. Wilson et al
as 2:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Derrick Huff
Defendant:
Jessica Lee Wilson and L. William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Slate et al
as 8:2012cv00693
Plaintiff:
Rex Douglas Reece, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Slate, Doctor Paul Matera, Doctor Jason Clem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copes v. Clem et al
as 1:2012cv00441
Plaintiff:
Randolph Copes
Defendant:
Dr. Clem and Jessica Cecil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Blake v. Jessica Miller
as 11-6818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSICA MILLER, Counselor and CO RAY MAZE
Louretha King v. Boyd Bennett
as 11-6515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOURETHA KING
Plaintiff:
SANDRA ETTERS, RONDA SINGLETARY and DEVEN DEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD BENNETT, Secretary, in his individual capacity, ALVIN KELLER, in his official capacity, ANNIE HARVEY, Administrator, in her individual and offical capacities and others
McGehrin v. Stanford et al
as 8:2011cv00818
Plaintiff:
Bryan McGehrin
Defendant:
Peter Stanford, Kathleen Green , David Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
