Cases 91 - 100 of 552
WATSON v. HARMON et al
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
LISA HARMON, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2021ct03346
Plaintiff:
Logan N. Young
Defendant:
Kenneth Sullivan, Jr., Mike Fowler, Sheriff John Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADUE v. FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
GERALD JOHN LADUE, JR.
Defendant:
FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, FORSYTH HOSPITAL DOCTOR and STOKES COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SEABOLT et al
as 1:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
KA'LAH (KALAH) MARTIN
Defendant:
GREGORY SEABOLT, STEVEN W MYERS, TRAVIS SHORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boomer-Mack v. Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2021ct03317
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Tayron Boomer-Mack
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSKEY v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL H. FOSKEY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN, CHARLES P. RETTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharma v. Sapper et al
as 5:2021ct03311
Plaintiff:
Siddhanth Sharma
Defendant:
John Sapper, Demetrius Clark, Felix Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schulz v. John Does 1-3 et al
as 3:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bernard Schulz
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. County of Onslow et al
as 5:2021ct03278
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ray
Defendant:
County of Onslow, Detective John Getty and Judge Kent Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
