Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Defendant:
William Bohrer, Samuel Croteau, Sgt.Brian Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jacobs v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2020cv01586
Defendant:
R. D. Golden, B. Abernathy, Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv01664
Plaintiff:
Clinton D Johnson, Jr and Kayzon Ru
Defendant:
Lt Jernigan, Officer Loutz, Ronald Hazzard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Simmons et al
as 8:2020cv00559
Defendant:
Sergeant Simmons, Warden Richard Dovery, Lt Kreetzer and others
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. Roselyn et al
as 8:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt Penner, Officer who worked 5/A on at Breakfast time, Lt Roselyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. Willett et al
as 1:2019cv01159
Defendant:
Captain S. Cook, Captain B. Hughes, Major M. Clavear and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson Jr. v. Steel et al
as 8:2018cv01405
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson Jr.
Defendant:
J. Steel, Joseph Lohman and State Rep Godlove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Robinette et al
as 8:2017cv03401
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Robinette, Lucretia Harrell and Chad Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 8:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson
Defendant:
Judith Jones and Collateral Review Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
