Cases 11 - 16 of 16
James Calhoun-El v. Corizon Medical Service
as 13-7073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. CALHOUN-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, Headquarters for Maryland, BARBARA NEWLON, Regional Agent, AVA JOUBERT, Medical Supervisor and others
Herman Rivers, Jr. v. Daniel Hodge, Sr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-6591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN F. RIVERS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL R. HODGE, SR., Superintendent, ONDRAKE NERO, Captain, Chief of Housing Units 4, 5 and 6, SERGEANT RONI and others
Defendant:
CAPTAIN LANGLEY, Chief of Program, NURSE JOHNSON and MS. CYNTIAX, Medical Supervisor
Marvin Moody v. Dr. Pabla
as 13-6058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. PABLA, Former Doctor, CAROLYN WILLIAMS, Medical Supervisor/Administration and WILLIAM RUBY, Doctor/Administrator
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, C. ROBERTSON, Former Medical Director, L. STANFORD, Medical Supervisor/Administrator and others
Carl Capers v. Clark
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-6257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL LORINZO CAPERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK, Kitchen Dietician, HARRINGTON, Kitchen Dietician, BULLOCK, Unit Superintendent and others
Odom v. Davis et al
as 5:2007ct03143
Plaintiff:
Deryl W. Odom
Defendant:
Dr. Davis, Medical Supervisor St. Louis, Superintendent Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Charles Co. Government and Council et al
as 8:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Bert Martin Carroll
Defendant:
Charles Co. Government and Council, Charles Co. Sheriff, Jail Personnell, Charles Co. Detention Center, Jail Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.