Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Sharma v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03029
Plaintiff:
Siddhanth Sharma
Defendant:
Pat McCrory and Wake County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Wake County et al
as 5:2016ct03030
Plaintiff:
Curtis Levon Jackson
Defendant:
Wake County, Pat McCrory and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2016ct03009
Plaintiff:
Bart Fitzgerald McClain
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Columbus Correctional Institution, Pat McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. McCrory
as 5:2015ct03340
Plaintiff:
John Edward Butler
Defendant:
Pat McCrory and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv01111
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. McCrory et al
as 5:2015ct03326
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Frank L. Perry, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03303
Plaintiff:
James A. Austin
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Smith v. US
as 15-7694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Faison v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03249
Plaintiff:
Moses Leon Faison
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
