Cases 101 - 110 of 3,397
Mason v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
N. Neville, Brittany Williams and Robin Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mr. Clint Davis and Mr. Ross Maurice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DreamyLove v. Richardson et al
as 2:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Quesha Keliah DreamyLove and Elijah Montrell Maven
Defendant:
Richardson, Kayogera and Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pressey v. Newport News City Jail
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Donald Pressey
Defendant:
Newport News City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. McCoy et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deon Walker
Defendant:
Steven McCoy, A. David Robinson, Several Unknown Prison Officials of S.I.S.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Phillip Davis
Defendant:
A. Jones, Creghead and Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison
Respondent:
C/O Johnson and C/O Mullens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhoades v. Sellars et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rhoades
Defendant:
Nurse Sellars, Nurse Sutton and Doc. Tamalin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
