Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Charlton Dowling v. Gregory Voigt
as 11-6748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLTON JAVIER DOWLING
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY VOIGT, J. AL CANNON, JR., Esq. and CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dowling v. Voigt et al
as 9:2011cv00634
Plaintiff:
Charlton Javier Dowling
Defendant:
Gregory Voigt, J Al Cannon, Jr and Carolina Center for Occupational Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Cannon et al
as 2:2010cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vinson
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Carolina Center for Occupational Health and Theoadore Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Cannon et al
as 8:2010cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vinson
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Carolina Center for Occupational Health and Theoadore Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Johnson v. J. Cannon, Jr.
as 10-6469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH J. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff, MITCH LUCAS, Detention Center Administrator, A. HANSON, Major at Detention Center and others
Nesbitt v. O'Neal et al
as 6:2009cv02874
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Dr Jacobs, Ms Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Julius B Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kendall Cohen v. Al Cannon, Jr.
as 09-7775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENDALL COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff and SHAWN JAMES, Deputy
Cox v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 3:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Cox, Jr
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Charleston Co Counsel, Al Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bolton v. Cannon
as 4:2009cv00843
Plaintiff:
Thurston M Bolton
Defendant:
Al Cannon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sansbury v. Cannon et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Defendant:
Lucas, Nurse Doscher, Al Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Neil Sansbury
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.