Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carraway v. Fields et al
as 5:2024ct03153
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Carraway, II
Defendant:
Lt. R. Fields, Officer J. Lane, Sgt. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. John Doe et al
as 5:2023ct03272
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ward
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Sgt. Christopher Bunting, Chip Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
KEITH CARTER
Defendant:
W-S POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Lewis et al
as 5:2023ct03043
Plaintiff:
Samuel Gordon Roberson
Defendant:
Doctor Lewis, Nurse Sykes, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Pasquotank Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2021ct03236
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
Pasquotank Correctional Institution, Sgt. Morris, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, JANE DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Daves et al
as 5:2019ct03040
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and Sergeant Daves
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Young et al
as 5:2011ct03273
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jaye Frost
Defendant:
J. P. Young, Arthur F Beeler, BOP Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Officer John Doe et al
as 5:2011ct03218
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Rice
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
