Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00936
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00884
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00177
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv00983
Defendant:
Andrei Iancu and Andrew Hirshfeld
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Leitner-Wise v. Clark, et al.
as 3:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Leitner-Wise
Defendant:
Southern Gun Company, Ltd., Robert Bernard Iredale Clark and Eugene L. Flanagan, III
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Paul Leitner-Wise v. LWRC International, LLC
as 17-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL ANDREW LEITNER-WISE
Defendant - Appellee:
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC and SIG SAUER, INC.
Leitner-Wise v. LWRC International, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv02430
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Leitner-Wise
Defendant:
LWRC International, LLC and Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
