Cases 11 - 20 of 26
City of Bristol Pension Fund v. 3D Systems Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02393
Plaintiff:
City of Bristol Pension Fund
Defendant:
3D Systems Corporation , Abraham N. Reichental and Damon J. Gregoire
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 3:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Alberta, Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association and City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Genworth Financial, Inc., Thomas J. McInerney and Martin P. Klein
Petitioner:
IWA Forest Industry Pension Plan, Carlos Viera and Sjunde AP-Fonden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Personnel Retirement Trust v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01227
Plaintiff:
City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Personnel Retirement Trust
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. , Robert M. Lynch and Daniel E. Terrell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lynn Szymoniak v. Aurora Loan Services LLC
as 14-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN E. SZYMONIAK, as relator on behalf of the United States of America
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ACE SECURITIES CORPORATION, AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL INCORPORATED, f/k/a GMAC Incorporated, PROMMIS SOLUTIONS, LLC and SECURITIES CONNECTION, INC.
:
and
Williams v. SAIC, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00412
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Williams , KBC Asset Management NV , LRI Invest S.A. and others
Defendant:
SAIC, Inc. , Gerard Denault, Kenneth Dahlberg and others
Movant:
Indiana Public Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, LB.E.W.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Goldman v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00777
Plaintiff:
Norton Goldman
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation , Michael W. Laphen , Michael J. Mancuso and others
Movant:
New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund , Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kramer v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Hilary Kramer
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation , Michael W. Laphen , Michael J. Mancuso and others
Movant:
New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund , Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation , Michael W. Laphen and Michael J. Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. et al v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. , United Hospital Center, Inc. , West Virginia University Hospitals - East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Securities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
The Mills Corporation Securiti
as 10-1150
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Appellant:
DANIEL ROCKER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - None:
KENNETH R. PARENT, NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Appellee:
JEFFREY WARREN GOLAN, JEFFREY ALAN BARRACK, CHAD A. CARDER and others
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
