Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Sawasky v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Patricia M Sawasky
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
FUHR v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
JOHN FUHR
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
THORNBURG v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2011cv00707
Plaintiff:
TONI THORNBURG
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WEAVER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
STEVE D. WEAVER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Irene Kaeding v. Commissioner
as 11-1312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRENE A. KAEDING
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
LAWSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
JUDY L. LAWSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
CALHOUN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00011
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL CALHOUN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Nalley v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv00191
Plaintiff:
Todd Livingston Nalley
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kaeding vs Commissioner of Social Security Admin
as 1:2009cv00382
Plaintiff:
Irene A Kaeding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
WADE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00705
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE and RICHARD WADE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.