Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Waddler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00371
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Milton Larry Waddler, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evans, Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Milton Lawrence Evans, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Milton Clark
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gerald v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv03446
Plaintiff:
Milton Gerald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2020cv03423
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Eric Milton Dean
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405
Milton v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02843
Plaintiff:
Derek Milton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Milton v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carolyn L. Milton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2010cv01353
Plaintiff:
Richard Milton Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spriggs v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv02163
Plaintiff:
Milton Spriggs
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
