Cases 11 - 20 of 427
Vital Farms, Inc. v. PETA
as 23-1888
Respondent:
VITAL FARMS, INC.
Appellee:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. and FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT ANIMAL PROTECTION, d/b/a PETA Foundation
Capital Broadcasting Company, Incorporated v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAPITAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MCCLATCHY COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a The News and Observer Publishing Company and JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C., d/b/a Law Offices of James Scott Farrin
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Christopher Holmes v. Elephant Insurance Company
as 23-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, TRINITY BIAS, JAIME CARDENAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY, ELEPHANT INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC and PLATINUM GENERAL AGENCY, INC., d/b/a Apparent Insurance
Boger v. Goodson
as 3:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Boger
Defendant:
Paul Goodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cleveland v. Nextmarvel Inc.
as 8:2023cv01918
Plaintiff:
Nia Cleveland
Defendant:
Nextmarvel Inc. d/b/a Vooglam and Nextmarvel Inc. doing business as Vooglam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant:
ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent:
CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee:
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver:
MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Ishayka Wood v. Omni Financial of Nevada, Inc.
as 23-1730
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ISHAYKA WOOD, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DELICIA GODFREY
Defendant / Appellant:
OMNI FINANCIAL OF NEVADA, INC., d/b/a Omni Financial, d/b/a Omni Military Loans
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Restaurant 54 LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Restaurant 54 LLC d/b/a 54 Restaurant, John Le, Restaurant 54 LLC doing business as 54 Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of the Communications Act of 1934
Ishayka Wood v. Omni Financial of Nevada, Inc.
as 23-1662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISHAYKA WOOD, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DELICIA GODFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
OMNI FINANCIAL OF NEVADA, INC., d/b/a Omni Military Loans, d/b/a Omni Financial
Singh v. Singh, et al.
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Bhupinder Singh
Defendant:
Harmanpreet Singh, Kaur Kulbir, Armaan VA Corp. d/b/a Lovely Market and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
